New Media, Political Campaigning
geplaatst op: 21-02-10 | tags: digital methods, framing, health care reform debate, Obama, Political Campaigning
I’ve written a paper about how framing shapes the health care reform debate in the U.S. I think it shows the tip of the iceberg, from what is possible with ‘Digital Methods’, a very interesting approach, that uses software to research society. It also includes some ‘old-fashion’ opinion polls from Harris, with quiet disturbing results. Did know for example that 37 percent of adult Americans believe that “the proposed reforms would create panels that would decide who should live and who should die”?
Abstract
After a widely applauded presidential campaign, enabled by grassroots and rhetoric, Barack Obama finds himself in a less comfortable position in the ongoing debate around the American health care reform. Linguist George Lakoff (2009a) argues that the decline of support on this issue is caused by an elaborate framing campaign of conservatives, and the lack of framing by the Obama administration. With the help of special software, I examined three spheres, the Web sphere, blogosphere and newssphere. This (limited) research mainly confirms Lakoff’s theories, but also show that Obama’s counter-frame is becoming more effective, which arguably led to mystification and misinformation (Castells, 2009).
You can find my paper here, or click on the read more button (I encountered some trouble with the layout in wordpress, there seems to be a big difference in some browsers)
Read the rest of this entry »
Boekrecensies
geplaatst op: 13-09-09 | tags: bookreview, new media politics, Political Campaigning
The brand new (31th of August 2009 according to Amazon) book “Political Campaigning on the Web” is a bundle of essays around the relatively new field of political campaigning in new media in its broadest sense. The book contains a broad spectrum of different sides of campaigning. Sigrid Baringhorst wrote the first chapter, which places the field of political campaigning on the web in its historical context. From there the book takes you through a bunch of interesting topics and analyses, from political party campaigns to web activism and petitions. Those articles end in a conclusion with interesting proposals for further research. Read the rest of this entry »
Columns M!, New Media, Political Campaigning
geplaatst op: 10-07-09 | tags: fandom, manifesto's, Obama, Political Campaigning, verdonk
Een essay over manifesto’s, fandom en de vermeende rol van nieuwe media bij politiek.
Inleiding
Rita Verdonk is heilig overtuigd van de kracht van nieuwe media. Haar mediabureau Mangrove zette een volledige website op poten; www.Trotsopnederland.com. Verdonk heeft een account op Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Hyves en zelfs een eigen wiki. ‘Net als Obama, maar wij waren eerder’, vertelde ze trots aan Matthijs van Nieuwkerk in De Wereld Draait Door. ‘Bij Obama was iedereen lyrisch, maar over ons heb ik nog weinig gehoord, hoe kan dat’, jammerde Verdonk vervolgens. Deze vraag zal ze Mangrove ongetwijfeld ook hebben voorgelegd, die haar vermoedelijk het (echte) antwoord schuldig moesten blijven.
Nieuwe media evangelisten, de zogehete digerati, buitelen op congressen, in boeken en weblogs over elkaar heen om utopische oplossingen te bieden in een veranderende wereld. De digerati wijzen er smalend op dat “oude media” het steeds moeilijker hebben, en dat wie de nieuwe media niet begrijpt kopje onder gaat. Utopische business manifesto’s als We Think, The Long Tail en Wikinomics vertellen hun lezers over een nieuwe wereld, die een nieuwe aanpak vergt (Van Dijck & Nieborg 2009). Deze aanpak wordt gepresenteerd als een formule tot succes, maar is dat lang niet altijd. In dit essay betoog ik dat er geen gestandaardiseerde succesformule is, en dat randzaken als fandom, positivisme en doelgroep een belangrijke rol spelen.
Read the rest of this entry »
I’ve written a paper about how framing shapes the health care reform debate in the U.S. I think it shows the tip of the iceberg, from what is possible with ‘Digital Methods’, a very interesting approach, that uses software to research society. It also includes some ‘old-fashion’ opinion polls from Harris, with quiet disturbing results. Did know for example that 37 percent of adult Americans believe that “the proposed reforms would create panels that would decide who should live and who should die”?
